Peace Discipline
hamburger menu


Discipline tools are not enough on their own. They need to be used with attunement to the child. Attunement means being in tune with the child and matching your responses to their needs and signals. If we know where they are, how they feel, what they can manage and why they do what they do, then we are more likely to choose tools which meet their needs. Good attunement by parents makes children feel safer and more loved and cared for. This is important in the classroom too. Children with teachers who are attuned to them behave and achieve better.

As we learn about non-violent discipline options, attunement helps us to choose the options which fit best with what each child needs. The Peace Discipline approach is that any discipline tool is not good or bad in itself. Rather, it should be evaluated according to its fit with the needs and signals of the child.

Sometimes the skill you try first won’t work. This is normal and should not be seen as a problem. There are plenty of other tools to try. Trying different tools is part of the process of attunement as we figure out what each child needs. You do not have to know what to do straight away, none of us manage that all the time and it is not a sign of failure. You might say: “I’m not happy about this. I’m going to think about it and talk to … and then decide what to do.” It’s fine to try different things until you feel you have found the right approach for a particular situation or child. Keep working at this, it will be worth it.

Attunement is the key to successful use of this toolkit. To improve attunement, work on your relationship with your child. Spend quality time with them and use skills such as active listening and monitoring.

Discipline Tool Kit

Basic Tools

Active Listening

This is possibly the most important tool in the toolkit. Most people think they already know and use this skill. However, once we understand it better, we realize that people generally listen very poorly, especially to children, and this often leads to conflict. Workshop feedback suggests that using active listening has been one of the things that made the biggest difference for participants and their families. In fact, people often report that it improves all their relationships, not just those with their children.

One of the quickest ways to make a person feel upset is not to listen to them. Good listening improves attunement, and attunement is what makes people feel safe. When children feel heard and safe, they are more able to listen to us too.

To listen properly we need to take off those “fixit” hats we often wear, and resist the desire to give advice. Replace criticism with curiosity: “How did you feel when she said that?” vs “I’m sick of you fighting with each other!” “What’s that like for you?” vs “How many times must I tell you not to leave things to the last minute!” “What are your options now?” vs “Well now you’re not going to be able to finish this on time!” Try: “Is there anything else?” instead of jumping in with advice. Be gently, genuinely curious, not a judgmental interrogator in disguise. Tune in to the child. What are they telling you non-verbally too? The child will learn: “How I feel matters. I am safe because my parent or teacher won’t judge me. They will take the time to listen to me and try to understand.”

In situations where a child is not co-operating, listen to their resistance, reasons, explanations etc. Once they have let all this out, you can engage them with better understanding and at a lower level of resistance. Hearing and understanding a child does not mean we have to give them what they want. You can be understanding and say “No” if you need to. For example: “You really wanted that treat and it’s hard for you that we said “no”. It’s also fine to allow some negotiation, e.g.“Alright, you can…, but then you must go straight away and…”; or “OK let’s make a deal…”

As you listen, give feedback that shows you understand e.g.: “I can see you are disappointed”; “You wish you could stay here longer.”; “You really don’t feel like going to school today.”; “You felt it was unfair when I…”;“It’s hard to wait”; “So it was an accident, you didn’t mean to…”; “Sounds like you’ve had a rough day.”; “So you felt left out when…”; “It’s difficult work and you wish you could somehow escape…” Empathy is a power tool for connection and safety.

Allow a child to “vent” if appropriate. This is a good skill to use when a child is upset or has “lost it”. The “it” that we lose when we “lose it” is the ability to think and reason. So don’t try to reason with them or persuade them that they shouldn’t feel that way or should see things differently. Just let them let it all out.

Adele Faber and Elaine Mazlish have written several wonderful books on listening e.g., How to Talk so Kids will Listen and Listen so Kids will Talk. They are easy to read, entertaining, with plenty of illustrations (cartoons) and examples.

We’re not sure who wrote this (below), but it contains a number of helpful points:


You are not listening to me when...

You do not care about me;

You say you understand before you know me well enough;

You have an answer for my problem before I’ve finished telling you what my problem is;

You cut me off before I’ve finished speaking;

You feel critical of my vocabulary, grammar or accent;

You are dying to tell me something;

You tell me about your experience making mine seem unimportant;

You are communicating to someone else in the room;

You refuse my thanks by saying you haven’t really done anything.

You are listening to me when...

You come quietly into my private world and let me be me;

You really try to understand me even if I’m not making much sense;

You grasp my point of view even when it’s against your own sincere convictions;

You realize that the hour I took from you has left you a bit tired and drained;

You allow me the dignity of making my own decisions even when you think they may be wrong.

You do not take my problem from me, but allow me to deal with it in my own way;

You hold back your desire to give me a good word of advice;

You do not offer me religious solace when you sense I am not ready for it;

You give me enough room to discover for myself what is really going on;

You accept my gift of gratitude by telling me how good it makes you feel to know you have been helpful.

Emotion Coaching

It’s important to talk to children about emotions, so they can learn that feelings are important, what different feelings are called and how they can share them with you. Emotion coaching teaches children emotional communication skills by using emotional experiences as opportunities for connection and teaching children about feelings. When the adult is talking with the child about their day or their experiences, questions are asked about and references are made to emotions, and feelings are labelled, discussed and validated. E.g. “How did you feel when she said that?”; “That must have been really frustrating”; “It sounds like your friend felt sad”; “ you felt scared?”

To find out more, read the section on communication in the research summary.


Time-in can be defined as quality time with parents during which there is physical touch and ample expressions of love, care, compassion and praise. Family rituals such as bed-time stories may be a good way to increase time-in. Research shows that children who get adequate time-in, behave better. This makes sense when we consider that problem behavior is often a child’s attempt to gain more attention and care. Time-in should be unconditional, in other words given freely - the child should not have to earn it.

Time-in is often considered the opposite to time-out, in fact the term was coined by researchers who observed that time-out didn’t work well unless there was good quality “time-in”. In other words, if your child does not have a good time with you generally, it’s not much of a deterrent to be sent to time-out. This has been misunderstood and distorted, resulting in the well-meaning advice often given to parents to “use time-in instead of time-out”. While increasing time-in is very good advice, it should not be seen as a substitute for time-out. Time-in is an antecedent intervention, in other words it is something we do to prevent problem behavior, while timeout is a tool we can use during (to interrupt), or immediately after a challenging behavior. For example, time-out can be useful to handle aggression. If we use regular time-in, there should be fewer aggressive situations, but once there is aggression one needs tools like time-out to deal with it. Time-in does not usually fit at this point. Once the child has stopped being aggressive, and hurting people, however, it would be a good idea to do some time-in to reconnect. Time-in and time-out are both important tools and we should keep both in our toolkit, using attunement to determine which is needed.


Monitoring matters. Many studies have shown that when parents supervise activities, and know where their children are and what they are doing, the children are less likely to get into trouble, such as sex at too young an age or substance abuse. It can make a big difference at school too, e.g., playground monitoring has been shown to be a significant protective factor against bullying. Monitoring limits opportunities for bad stuff to happen, and it’s an important part of our job as parents and teachers.

Monitoring does not only mean surveillance. Open communication, of the kind that encourages child disclosure, has been shown to play an important role. In other words, parents who know what’s happening and where their children are, often know because their children tell them. Children need to feel safe to tell us where they are, what is happening, and know that they can reach out to us at any time if things get dangerous.

To find out more, read the section on monitoring in the research summary.


There’s not much research on this skill, but experience tells us its important. If someone asked you to do something without any preparation or warning, and then expected you to do it immediately, it would be understandable if you felt annoyed, especially if you were already busy with something else. Letting children know what is going to happen or what will be expected of them is a respectful thing to do. It can also be reassuring. If they know an event is coming, they can get used to the idea and, once it happens, feel: “nothing is wrong, this was meant to happen”. In this way, preparation can help children to feel safe.

Here are some examples: “After this we will be going to…and then we will…”; “Tomorrow evening Mom and Dad are going out and…” “When we go to the doctor she will…”. “At the end of this program we will switch off the TV and it will be time to…” For teachers: “In this lesson we will… and then…”; “I see your hands and will hear from … and then …”; “This term there will be two assessments, a test and a project…”

It helps to prepare ourselves too. Think ahead to the usual trouble spots in the day and be prepared with some positive options to try. For teachers, being well prepared for a lesson makes a big difference. Tip: Prepare for the discipline, not just for the lesson.

By temperament, some children have a cautious first response, which means they often resist new things, then warm up to them with time. Some children adapt slowly. This is also a temperament factor, in other words, it’s a genetically inherited characteristic and not a sign that something is wrong with them. Some children have both of these temperament traits and in this case you’ll have noticed that they really don’t like surprises and resist when there is a change in plan. These children benefit when the adults in their lives use the skill of preparation and let them know what’s coming. The child who resists when you tell them a plan, may well be the one who most needs you to tell them.


Routine, rules, policies, schedules, turns and deadlines are all examples of structure. Structure can play a vital role in helping children feel safe. It makes things more predictable and can reassure children that we are in control and will ensure fairness. For example, children can stop fighting when adults make sure that everyone gets a turn, or gets their fair share of a treat. They can stop nagging for something when there is a rule or routine that tells them when that thing will happen (e.g., “Friday is treat day” or “we are not allowed screen time during the week” or “we always read stories before bed”).

Routine can help children feel reassured and know what to expect. When you say: “It’s time to…”, the message is that things are happening the way they are meant to. When things are more predictable, children can count on getting what they need rather than trying to control things themselves, or engaging in attention-seeking behaviors.

Other examples of structure:

“We have a rule here that…”
“Today is your turn to…”
“You may each have 2 pieces.”
“I’m not going to buy it now, but shall we put it on your wish list?”
“We never watch TV in the morning.”
“We have two days when you can watch a movie. On Friday it is your turn to choose and
on Saturday it is you sister’s turn.”
“Your time-out will be 2 minutes long”.
“I’m counting to 3...”

For Teachers:

“A teacher will call your parents if…”
“Today is the red group’s turn to…”
“If a student is caught smoking…”
“Let’s put that on the agenda for our meeting.”
“When you have finished your work you may….or… but you may not….”

To find out more about structure, read the research summary.


Bed-time stories or songs, birthday cake & candles, special clothes for special occasions, goodbye handshakes, a crying song, family meals, “bests and worsts”, movie night. What were your childhood rituals?

Rituals help us to feel a sense of belonging and connection, and will create many cherished childhood memories. They are reassuring and make transitions easier. They provide opportunities for love and attention that children can count on, and children who can count on your attention are less likely to behave badly to get it.

Teachers: Think of how this can apply in the classroom. How do you greet, say goodbye, celebrate birthdays, welcome newcomers, or start the story-time?

Praise / Positive Feedback

Two things stand out in research on praise. The one is how important it is for children, the other is that parents and teachers don’t use it enough. Knowing they are valued, seen and appreciated is reassuring for children, and makes it safer to hear about that area that needs work. Praise has been shown to have positive effects on both behavior and academic achievement. To have effects on behavior, praise needs to be behavior-specific, and about something in the child’s control. For example, “Well done, you packed those things away so neatly” rather than “You’re awesome!” or “I admire the way you didn’t give up when the sum was difficult.” instead of “You’re so clever”. Of course, there’s nothing wrong with telling your child they are awesome, but behavior specific praise is more likely to have an impact on their future actions.

So tell children the things you appreciate about them. Notice them being good or doing the right thing and acknowledge them for it. Do this often – much more often than you mention any problems. In a group of children, this can have a ripple effect, as other children also try to be noticed for doing good. Praise does not have to be verbal. A smiley face drawn next to work done well, a note to parents about something positive the child did at school, or a high five during a game can mean the world to a child.

Well-meaning advice in parenting books and on the internet sometimes suggest that praise is not good for children or that one should use encouragement instead. We found no evidence to support this theory. Like all the tools, however, praise should be used with attunement to the child. If they do not respond well, there is probably a valid reason. Perhaps they do not want attention drawn to them in that moment, or perhaps they praise does not match well with their actions, and feels phony or controlling. Sensitivity to what the child is needing in the moment is a more important consideration than the benefits of any particular skill. To find out more about this, read the section on attunement.

Containing Tools

If you come from a punitive background, in which you were punished with harsh methods such as corporal punishment, you may find yourself wondering whether non-violent skills will be enough to teach good behavior and respect. You may worry that this approach is too “soft”, or that children will get away with too much. In our context most people come from a punitive background, and many share these fears when switching to a non-violent approach, so we find it useful to teach what we call “Containing Tools”. What these skills have in common is that in each case the child does not get away with negative behavior.

Adjusting Freedom

Children need unconditional love and acceptance, but not unconditional freedom and responsibility. How much freedom does your child manage? Giving them too much can be a kind of neglect. We need to adjust their freedom according to what they can handle. In this picture, the green circle represents what the child can handle, and the pink circle represents the amount of freedom they were given. This child needs their freedom to be reduced so that it fits what they can handle or they will not manage. (Image by Nicole Rennie).

adjusting freedom

So take control and make some changes in response to your child’s behaviour. Some examples: putting breakable things out of a toddler’s reach; a child lock on the car door; holding their hand if they might run into the road; limiting TV; supervising computer time; checking homework if they don’t do it properly; grounding them for a while if they don’t respect rules about going out. For teachers: starting a mandatory homework session for those who don’t do it at home; separating friends who talk in class if they sit together; involving parents in an area the child is not managing on their own. All of these examples take away some of the child’s freedom, but in each case the thing that was taken away was the thing the child was not managing. This is an attuned response, not a punishment.

Keep making adjustments until the child has the amount of freedom and responsibility they can handle. Adjustments to freedom can be used whenever you feel they are needed, not only when the child has done something “wrong”. These adjustments are not usually permanent, changing according to what you can trust the child with and what is appropriate. Sometimes we will need to “make the circle bigger” i.e. give more freedom and responsibility. Flexibility is good if it is in response to what the child needs and what they can handle.

If the child cannot manage something at all, a long-term adjustment or limit on their freedom will be needed, for example, supervising them near water for several years when they are small, to ensure their safety. Sometimes however, a child can manage something but is being defiant or irresponsible. In this case a short-term adjustment works well, such as taking away computer privileges for a day because they are not playing by the computer rules, or insisting that children play inside for a while because they got up to mischief outside. Another name for a short-term adjustment of freedom is a time-out.

Time Out

Time-outs are most often used for aggression and non-compliance. There are two kinds of time-out: exclusionary and non-exclusionary. Exclusionary timeouts may be necessary in the case of aggression, but in other situations either kind has been shown to work well.

Exclusionary Time-outs

When children do something aggressive, we may need to use an exclusionary time-out (removing them from people they might hurt for a short while). At the point a time-out is needed for aggression, the child is likely to be in an angry and disregulated state. The thinking parts of their brain are not available to them right then, so it is not helpful to try to reason with them or say that they should go and think about what they have done.

Time-outs can help us to let out overheated emotions and cool down. There are various ways to do a time-out, and adults need to work out what best suits each child and situation. If we think of time-out as an adjustment of freedom, rather than a punishment, it may help us to see what kind is needed. Eventually, children can learn to take their own time-outs, and this will be a skill they can use throughout life. Our world might be a less violent place if more adults took time-outs too.

Much of the information on time-out in parenting books and on the internet has been found to be inaccurate. To find out more about what the research really says, read about time-out in the research summary. In brief:

Parenting programmes that teach some form of time-out seem to have better results in terms of child behavior. The most important parameter of time-out is that the time-out condition needs to be less reinforcing than the time-in environment. Other than this, there is room for a lot of variation in the way time-out is administered. The fact that so many different kinds of time-out have proven effective is good news as it suggests that parents and teachers can tailor timeouts according to what feels right for them and what best suits the child and situation.
Research shows no benefit of a short, verbalized reason before or after time-out in terms of child compliance, but it does suggest that parents and other adults prefer to use them. On the question of whether one should give a warning before time-out: Warnings appear to increase aggression. No warning, or one short warning both reduce noncompliance, but more than one warning can increase noncompliance.
There is not enough evidence yet to determine what specific location (e.g., chair, corner, or room) is best (all have been effective), or whether in-room adult supervision is beneficial. There is no evidence base for determining duration according to age. 5 minutes or less is usually sufficient - longer time-outs do not add any benefit. Sequencing effects are a common finding, i.e. that decreasing from an established duration usually results in worse behavior. It seems best to start with a shorter duration such as 1 or 2 min and increase the length if necessary.
Regarding who ends the time-out: one study showed significantly more compliance and less time-outs given with parent-controlled release than with child-controlled release.
Timeouts in the studies reviewed were implemented calmly, not in a harsh or rejecting manner, and work better in a context where interaction between parent and child is usually of good quality (see time-in).

Some guidelines and suggestions for using exclusionary time-outs

Stay calm. If the adult loses control, the conflict may escalate, children will feel less safe and lose sight of what they could learn.
Don’t threaten a time out, just give one, or count and then give one. (See research on how warnings tend to increase aggression). On the other hand, it can be useful to prepare your child at a time they are not out of control, by telling them about time-outs, preparing them that you will be using them, and answering any questions they may have. That way they won’t be shocked when you implement one.
A length of between 1 and 5 min is usually enough – start with less and see if you need more. Don’t try to stop a tantrum. Once they have “let it out” they will come back into control. Sometimes children need longer. Check in at the end of the prescribed time. Tell them their time out is finished and then let them stay longer if they want to. If they are still being aggressive, however, say: “It’s time to come out, but I see you are not ready yet”. Use your attunement. You may hear that their crying has changed from angry to sad. If they are still crying, but no longer being aggressive, it is better to offer them comfort than extend the time-out. If they are not ready for your comfort they will show you and then you should respect that, letting them know that you are there to comfort them when they are ready.
Don’t try to stop a tantrum, let them “let it out”. Don’t lock them up and abandon them. Stay nearby. It’s also fine to reassure a child if they need it e.g. ‘I’m right here.” or “You have only 1 minute left”.

Reconnect. When they are ready to come out, it’s a good time for hugs and apologies. It may also be a good time to do some active listening about what upset them so much, now that they have cooled down and stopped hurting people. Do not take this as an opportunity to lecture the child about what happened. The most important thing at this time is to reconnect, so offer a hug rather than a stern talking-to.

If connection is so important, is using a time-out ok?

If we use time-outs appropriately, the messages are not: “Now you’ll be sorry!” or: “Let me give you something to cry about!” but: “You seem to need this.” or “I won’t let you hurt people.” Other positive time-out messages could be: You are free to take your own time- out if you need one. It’s a safe place for your rage. You can use this space to feel what you feel and let it all out. It’s not forever. You know when it’s going to end and that nothing bad will happen. You are free to choose what you do in your time-out, as long as it doesn’t hurt or damage. You don’t have to suffer in your time-out. You are safe and loved, even at your worst.

Isolation can be painful for children, but think about when we use this: It’s not because the child didn’t agree with you or had an emotion. It’s because they just kicked or bit someone, or started screaming and lashing out. It’s when they have been very rude and nasty to someone, or just out of control. It’s ok for a child to learn: “These kinds of behavior are bad for my connection with people.” Or “Acting like this leads to me losing some freedom.” A great way to explain this to a child is: “Sometimes I have to stop you – one day you will be able to stop yourself.”

By the time we use a time-out, a disconnection has often already happened and the child is not responding to your attempts to reconnect. They push you away or fight you. A time-out can be a quicker route back to connection than letting aggressive or out of control behavior go on and on or escalate. Connection and boundary go hand in hand in making things safe for children.

If you are still concerned about whether using time-out is ok, here is a link to an excellent paper on this. You can also read more in the research summary.

Using time-out at school

Teachers can use time-outs at school if a child is out of control, but need to be aware of school policy and discuss and decide appropriate ways to use time-outs in their school environment e.g., for valid reasons, some schools have a policy that you may not send a child out of class. At school it is often better to use non-exclusionary time-outs.

Non-exclusionary time-outs

With non-exclusionary time-outs, the child is not sent to a separate venue. There are a lot of different ways to do a non-exclusionary time-out. A useful way to come up with the appropriate non-exclusionary time-out is to identify what the child is not managing, and give them a time-out from that thing. In other words, adjust their freedom for a short period (see adjusting freedom) e.g., a time-out from participating in a game they are disrupting, a time-out from their phone until their homework is done, a time-out from playing outside because they broke the outside rules. Non-exclusionary timeouts can be longer than exclusionary time-outs. Fit the amount of time to the situation e.g., they might have timeout from their phone for an hour or two, timeout from computers for a day or two or timeout from participating in a game for a minute or two. Use attunement to make decisions about what kind of time-out to use and what length of time is needed.

Here are some more examples of non-exclusionary time-outs:

Time apart: Sometimes children are losing it with each other and need some time apart from each other. They are managing everything else, but not managing being with each other. You could say: “Time apart!” or: “Have you had enough of each other? You need some time apart.” The children have more freedom than they do in an exclusionary time- out, but may not play together or be in the same place for a while. You may find they start to want to be together again. Encourage apologies first and the understanding that they must now play together nicely.

Cool down: This is a rest or any calming activity, for children who are getting too physically hyped up. You could think of it as a time-out from running around.

Making Amends

When they have wronged or inconvenienced someone, children can be asked to make amends. This is also called restitution and it’s an important part of discipline. We can teach this skill by example too e.g., “I owe you one.” or “I’d like to make it up to you by…”

Teach children of all ages to apologize when they have wronged someone, and lead by example in this. Sincere apologies are vital in repairing connection. One reason a child may refuse to apologize, is how unsafe they feel to do so. If a teacher or parent is non-punitive, and consistently follows through with apologies (e.g.: “We have unfinished business...”), it will make it safer for children to apologize. They realize everyone will do it, so it’s ok.

Aside from apology, encourage responsibility by asking children to clean what they messed, put back what they took, help fix what was broken, show the librarian the torn page in the book etc.

Times when an apology really doesn’t seem like enough, or when the wrong person is counting the cost of the behavior, are often good times to use the option of making amends. Examples of making amends: Child to child: “I’ll lend you my special pen.”; “I’ll give you my turn.”; “I’ll play your game.” Child to parent / family: Making tea or doing an extra chore. Parent to child: play their game / go to the park. Child to teacher, class or school: Staying to help clean the classroom to make up for disruptions; Acts of service such as sanding desks or knitting blanket squares to make up for vandalism, stealing or other offenses.

Other restorative options

Restorative justice brings us the perspective that all crime and wrongdoing occurs in the context of relationship and incurs the responsibility of repairing the hurt and damage caused to others. Research suggests that people who have been through a Restorative Justice process are less likely to re-offend, or re-offend as seriously, than those on the receiving end of retribution and punishment. The victims of the crime also tend to be more satisfied with the outcomes. A facilitated meeting in which an offender hears from the person they have wronged about the effects of their actions, or from their own family about their feelings on the matter, can be a powerful turning point. But why wait until someone commits a crime? Restitution could be a basic principle of discipline, long before the wrongdoing gets to such a serious level.

Family Group Conferences, Victim-Offender Mediation and Talking Circles are examples of restorative justice interventions. Versions of these are being used successfully in homes and classrooms too. If you would like to learn more about making amends, have a look at the restorative justice section of the research summary.

Introducing a Cost

Ask yourself: “Who is counting the cost of this child’s behavior?” Can the cost to everyone else be shifted to the child responsible for the problem behavior? We can encourage responsibility by adding a small cost for behavior that usually costs others. This skill is very effective. No lecturing is needed, just a simple cost, like the cost of plastic shopping bags. Allow the child to decide if it is worth it for them, and accept their decision either way. E.g.“I can pick up my own clothes or owe Mom 50c per item for picking up after me…”; “I can go to the bathroom before class, or owe the teacher 5 minutes of break, for time I took out of the lesson.”; “I can co-operate now, or pay back time I wasted after school.” Or “Copies of notes I lose cost R1 per page.”

Cost can be used on its own, or combined with a reward system e.g. children could earn or pay in points or tokens. Frame this as a cost, payment, or way to make up for something, rather than a fine. A cost is different from a fine. While a fine is just a punishment, a cost encourages responsibility. When they grow up – they may decide they don’t want to do something themselves, such as their tax or ironing, they may outsource something, and pay for this service, but it remains their responsibility. Using this skill can help prepare them for that. To make it a cost rather than a fine, make sure children know up front what the cost will be for what, rather than announcing “that will cost you…” without any warning. That way the child has the responsibility to make a choice about whether they are prepared to incur the cost or not.

“When-then” Statements

Although we found no research on this, workshop feedback shows that parents find this simple tool easy to use and hugely effective. Participants often say things like: “I can’t believe we didn’t think of this before!” or “It’s unbelievable how much difference this has made!” Here’s how to use it:

Make something a child wants to do conditional on something they resist doing. For example, if they refuse to pick up their toys, you could wait until a little later when they ask you if they can watch TV, then say: “When you have put your toys away, then you can watch TV”. Here are some other examples: “When you’ve got your shoes on, then you can go outside”; “When you’ve done your homework, then you can go to your friend”. Rather than trying to force a child to do something they are not ready to do, wait until they want to do something else, and then address the thing they resisted earlier. You might say: “Wait, we have unfinished business: First go and say sorry to your brother.” Or “When you have done… then you may do…”

Teaching and Guiding

Discipline is based on the word “disciple”.

Replacement Behaviors

“Do” rather than “don’t

While it’s not wrong or damaging to say “don’t…” to a child, it’s not nearly as effective as teaching them what to do instead. If we know the function of a child’s misbehavior (why they do it), then we can give them a better way to get what they want, like appropriate ways to seek attention or ask for a break. A lot of strong evidence shows that teaching children and adolescents appropriate behaviors to replace problem behaviors can be highly effective. This website is taking the same approach: instead of saying “don’t hit children” we are explaining what people can do instead, offering more effective, evidence supported alternatives.

To use this skill, one needs to identify the function (purpose) of a challenging behavior, stop rewarding it, teach the child an appropriate way to get what they want (the replacement behavior), and reward the appropriate behavior instead.


1) At the shop, a child nags their parent to buy them an item. The parent says “no,” and the child throws a tantrum. Feeling embarrassed about the attention this attracts from others in the shop, the parent gives in and buys the item. This scene repeats almost every time they go shopping.

Identify the function (purpose) of the problem behavior:
The child wants the parent to buy them something.
Stop rewarding the problem behavior:
The parent stops rewarding nagging and tantrums by no longer giving in and buying things.
Teach the child an appropriate way to achieve what they want:
The parent starts a wish list and teaches the child that, when they see something they want in the shop, they can ask to add it to the wish list.
Reward the replacement behavior instead:
When the child askes to put an item on their wish list the parent pays attention, listens to what the child wants and puts it on the wish list. When they are happy to buy the child something, such as on their birthday, or a treat day, they buy items from the wish list.

For the child, putting things on the wish list becomes the most reliable way to get what they want, and supermarket tantrums, which no longer work, become obsolete.

2) A child becomes argumentative and rude when the teacher tries to help them with their work. Each time this happens, the teacher sends them out of class and the child does not complete or come to understand the work.

Identify the function of the problem behavior: The child finds the work difficult, feels overwhelmed and wants to escape, so they become argumentative and rude, which the teacher unwittingly rewards by sending them out of class (escape from work).
Teach a replacement behavior: The teacher speaks with the child about feeling overwhelmed and gives them an alternative strategy: Next time they can say: “It’s too much, I need a break”. Reward this behavior: When they do this, the teacher stops and allows a one-minute break before continuing. Stop rewarding the problem behavior: If they forget and start being rude, the teacher does not send them out of class, but instead prompts them to ask for a break, allowing one once they have asked.

For the child, asking for a break becomes the best way to respond when they feel overwhelmed. Arguing and being rude no longer work.

More examples

Teaching a child to put their hand on your arm, signaling that they need to speak to you once you have finished speaking, instead of interrupting while you are speaking.
Teaching a child to call for help or support, instead of hitting their sibling.
Teaching a child to ask the teacher to check something in their work, rather than act out to get attention.

In each case, attunement is needed to work out the function of the child’s behavior. The adult needs to tune in and try to work out why a child is doing something. Is it for more attention or escape? Are they doing this to get something? Once we know what the child was trying to get out of the problem behavior, we can teach them what to do instead. Children are often happy to co-operate and learn replacement behaviors, because we are helping them to get what they want in a better way, without getting into trouble. If we teach children how to come to us with their needs, there will be less need for them to come at us.

This skill is a simplified version of more technical behavioral interventions teaching replacement behaviors, such as functional communication training and differential reinforcement of alternative behavior. To find out more about these, you can read the summary in the research section of this website.

“Next time…”

Once you have identified what you would like the child to do instead of the problem behavior, a good way to teach them the replacement behavior may be to say: “Next time…” Children usually respond well to this. e.g.: “Next time your brother won’t stop that when you ask him to, come and ask me for help.”; “Next time you are out and your cell phone dies, please send me a message from a friend’s phone.”; “Next time you feel like that, please come and tell me so I can be there for you.”


A child asks for something, forgetting to say “please”. The Parent responds with: “please” and the child repeats the request, this time adding “please”. This parent is using the skill of modeling to teach their child the appropriate way to ask. Modeling used in this way is a kind of prompting, which is a tool we can use to remind children to do things. We can also use modeling to demonstrate things we are trying to teach a child, like how to plant a seed, be gentle with an animal, how to say sorry, or speak in a respectful tone of voice. It’s natural for children to watch what we do and copy us, and we can use this to teach and guide them.

Another kind of modeling, often called “parental modelling”, is the example we set for our children. This is something important to think about because research shows it does have an effect. To find out more about the evidence, have a look at the summary in the research section of this website. We need to think about whether we are happy with the example we are setting for our children in areas such as how we speak to each other, how we speak about others, respect, kindness, responsibility, alcohol use, recycling, what we eat, how we drive, how much time we spend using phones and other devices, etc. Our children are watching us. What are we teaching them?


Prompting is a tool we can use to guide and remind children to do things. Here are some different kinds of prompting:

Visual prompts: e.g., a sign or picture reminding children to wash their hands.

Gestural prompts: e.g., a hand signal, or pointing at the trash can to remind the child to throw away a sweet wrapper.

Verbal prompts: e.g., saying “Wipe your feet on the mat”, or “Now put it back in the cupboard…”

Model prompts: e.g. the parent says “thank-you” to remind the child to say it.

Physical prompts: physically guiding the child to do something e.g., leading a child by the hand; gently turning them towards the basin to wash their hands.

An important consideration in using this tool is to match the level of prompting to the needs and signals of the child, in other words to use this skill with attunement. A visual, gestural or verbal prompt leaves more up to the child than modelling or physical prompts. The right prompt to use depends on the level of support the child is needing.

Behavior analysts often use prompts systematically, in a hierarchy of least to most, or most to least intrusive prompts, depending on what they are trying to achieve. To find out more about this have a look at the summary in the research section.


Sometimes it can be constructive to ask the child to do something over again, this time the way you want them to do it. E.g. “Let’s try that again and this time greet / ask respectfully / wipe your feet on the mat / come into the classroom quietly”. We are suggesting this as a form of guidance, to teach children what is expected by doing it, getting it right and then receiving praise. We do not mean asking a child to do something over and over as a punishment.

Remedial Stories

“Once, there was a little, tiny mouse….” Or: “When I was 14, I liked this girl ...” Stories get a completely different reaction to lectures.

It could be argued that this is one of our most ancient discipline tools. The idea that behavior can be shaped by the telling of stories seems universal, with moral tales and fables forming an important part of every culture across the world and throughout history. Surprisingly, there is not much research available on the effects of story-telling, but experience shows us that children respond much better to stories than lectures. The message gets through, while you and your children enjoy connecting.

Some people are good at making up stories, specially tailored to convey something relevant to what their children are experiencing. Others find this difficult and would prefer to find a story online or in a book such as Healing Stories for Challenging Behavior (Perrow, S. 2008). As with any tool, remedial stories should be used with attunement, for example they should be age-appropriate, and should not be used to frighten or manipulate children.

If you would like to find out about social narratives, which are stories first composed to help teach children with autism about social situations, have a look at the summary in the research section.

Other Useful Tools


To use this skill, get the child’s attention in a creative way and then direct them into the desired activity. Make it fun to co-operate using stories, humour, songs, games, interesting objects etc. e.g., a tidy-up game called “shipwreck”in which the children need to “save” all the toys by putting them in the “lifeboat” which is the toybox; telling a story to distract and keep a child co-operating when they don’t feel like feeding themselves or getting dressed; a game in which the children get points for spotting different types of cars on a long car trip. Tip: To reduce rivalry in games with points, get the children to work together towards a target rather than to compete against each other.
Since parents are often advised to use this tool, we expected to find a lot of evidence on the effects of distraction used by parents, but surprisingly we did not find research in this area. By far the majority of evidence on distraction comes from medical literature, which makes sense when one considers how often doctors, nurses and dentists need to support children and adolescents through anxiety-provoking, uncomfortable or painful procedures. In medical settings, distraction involves drawing the child's attention away from something painful or distressing and toward something else, such as a video or game. This has been found to reduce pain and discomfort. The theory behind this is that the distraction takes up space in the brain that would otherwise be used to focus on the pain. Distraction in the home or classroom works on the same principle: Because you are doing something in a fun way, the child focusses less on the fact that they have to do something they don’t feel like doing, such as eat their vegetables, learn their tables or tidy up.

Well-meaning people have warned against distraction in medical settings, saying that it is better to prepare and reassure the child. This is not evidence-based advice. What studies actually show, is that children experience less pain during distraction than during reassurance, and appreciate adults using this skill. Using distraction does not mean that you cannot also use preparation or reassurance, and it does not mean deceiving or tricking the child.


Some people frown on the use of rewards and call them “bribes”. So let’s clear that up at the start by looking at the difference: A reward is giving someone something for doing something good. A bribe is giving someone something for doing something bad, something they are not supposed to do. The difference is not when we offer it, or who’s idea it was, or anything else. The difference lies in what kind of behavior we are rewarding. Therefore parents and teachers, who are trying to teach children appropriate behavior, are not using bribes.

The question is not whether we should or shouldn’t use reward. We all use reward. The question is whether we use rewards consciously and constructively or not. For example, adults often unwittingly reward problem behavior by paying more attention or giving in to demands when a child misbehaves. Once we realize this is happening, we can stop rewarding problem behavior and start consciously rewarding appropriate behavior.

Offering a child a simple reward or incentive for doing something they are not motivated to do can work really well. Ice blocks in their juice, a turn to light the candle, playing a game together, extra computer time, a funny story, a smiley face drawn on their finger, a star or sticker, extra time for break …What motivates your child or the children in your class?

Rewards can add that bit of motivation needed for the child to exercise more self-control, and have been found to be very important for children with ADHD. Rewards can help children practice delayed gratification, i.e., to wait for what they want. As one child put it: “It’s teaching me to do “worst first”. They need to be old enough to exercise delayed gratification though (not 1 or 2). Rewards that are quite immediate, i.e. don’t involve waiting long will probably start working when children are between 3 and 4 years old, and as they get older, longer term rewards can also be used.

Some suggestions

Things we cut back on can become useful motivators (e.g. screen time).
Use things that you are happy to give children.
Using lots of small rewards can work well, like points, stickers or popcorn kernels in a jar.
Reduce competition by getting children to save together in a combined jar or points system.
Be specific about what you are asking and what the reward is.
Think ahead so you can be prepared with an incentive at times of resistance.

How to avoid negative effects of reward

Some studies have shown that using rewards can undermine intrinsic motivation. Well- meaning people have taken this to support the idea that we should never use rewards, in fact whole books have been written on this topic, but this approach ignores a lot of other evidence showing that rewards can work well and, in fact, can have some amazing long- term benefits for children. For an example of this have a look at the evidence below on the “Good Behavior Game”, used by teachers.

Reward, like any other tool, needs to be used with care and attunement. The adult needs to keep monitoring the situation to ensure that the outcomes are constructive, for instance that rewards are not overused or that the way they are used is not causing unhealthy competition between children, or undermining their motivation instead of increasing it. To avoid undermining intrinsic motivation, the key is not to use reward when the child is already motivated to do something. If you use it where a child is not motivated, there should not be any problem, which is good news because this is where it is most useful to us as parents and teachers. Once a child is managing fine and no longer needs reward to accomplish something, the reward can be faded out.

Group contingencies

Group contingencies are a particularly effective kind of reward system often used by teachers. There are different kinds and you can find out more in the summary in the research section. The Good Behavior Game is an example of a group contingency and has been found to have important short-term and long-term benefits for children. Children who have played it often at school show better attention and concentration, and less aggression, disruptive or oppositional behavior. Many years after playing the game, they are also less likely to abuse alcohol or other substances, less likely to have conduct disorders, or to be depressed. In this kind of reward system, the whole group earns rewards according to the behavior of any or all of their members. To find out more, read the research summary.

Group contingencies can also be used in the home, by getting siblings to work together for a special treat once they meet a certain target. For example, the children each earn beans for good behavior which are collected in the same jar. Once the jar is full, the whole family goes to the movies or water slides. Other examples: the children have to work together to meet a daily points target to qualify to watch an episode of a series each evening; the children earn minutes which are added together to determine the amount of screen time they are all allowed.

Engaging and Involving Children More

Opportunities to Respond (OTR)

This is a tool for teachers which involves increasing opportunities for all students to respond, as opposed to the common situation, in which students raise their hands in response to a teacher question, and only one student is chosen to respond. Research shows that increasing children’s opportunities to participate and respond in class not only improves their academic performance but also significantly improves their behavior. There are various ways to do this. Instead of getting an answer from just one student each time, teachers can use choral responding; partner talk; group discussion; response cards; hand signals etc. To find out more, have a look at the summary in the research section.

Increasing OTR is likely to improve teacher attunement to students, as it gives teachers an immediate indication of students’ understanding, enabling them to adjust their lessons to fit better with student needs. E.g., if all students hold up response cards with the right answer, the teacher may move on to something more challenging, but if a number of students have the wrong answer, the teacher may explain more first, then check understanding again. Without response cards, the teacher might assume class-wide understanding, based on a few students giving accurate answers, while a number of others do not yet understand the concept.

Meetings and Problem Solving

This tool involves meeting as a family, class, in small groups or one on one with a child to decide on rules, express views, or solve problems. Meetings would usually involve discussion of problems and brainstorming of solutions, the most constructive of which would later be chosen together and implemented. Involving children in this way has many benefits, such as increased respect, improved adult-child relationships and a decrease in problem behavior.

Call a meeting to discuss a specific problem, involving the children in finding solutions. How formal this is depends on what suits your family or class. It could take the form of an informal discussion at the dinner table, or a formal meeting with an agenda. It may be a good idea to use a talking stick. Here is a suggested format:

  1. Start with something positive, such as each person saying something affirming about the person on their left, or there could be a round in which each person answers a specific question such as: “What is going well for you at the moment?” or “What do you appreciate about being in this family or class?”
  2. Discuss the problem, inviting everyone to explain it and say how it affects them.
  3. Move on to a brainstorming phase in which each person can give their best ideas to solve the problem, without interruption or criticism. You may be surprised at what children come up with e.g.: secret signals, using a timer or chart, or making up a fake “swearword” they can use whenever they want. Treat children as though each has a valuable contribution to make and can think of solutions.
  4. Consider all the solutions and choose one together.
  5. Implement the solution and check in future meetings whether it is working.

If you can’t seem to problem-solve together, check your connection with each other. People who feel connected can problem-solve better. It is also useful to be clear where you are giving children “a voice but not a choice” and where they do have a choice. The adults are still in charge. Although the children have a lot of say when using this tool, adults play an important role in holding the meeting so that it remains constructive, fair and respectful e.g., you may need to give guidance about not ganging up on someone in the group.

Jane Nelsen gives useful guidance on family and classroom meetings, with many helpful examples in her book Positive Discipline. You can also find out more by reading the student participation and collaborative problem solving sections of the research summary.


Self-management involves self-monitoring and usually self-recording of a specific target behavior (good or problem behavior) and may involve other components like goal-setting, self-evaluation and self or adult-delivered rewards. For example, children might be asked to monitor a specific behavior (e.g., Did I stay in my seat?), tick off a list of chores, track how much time they spent on something, or rate the quality of their work. Self-management is a well-tested tool with strong evidence of effectiveness across a wide range of ages, disabilities and target behaviors.

One of the goals of discipline is that children eventually develop self-discipline, and self-management is one way to encourage this. Attunement will be needed to assess whether they are ready to use self-management or whether it would be better to use a different tool, such as a daily report card filled in by the teacher and signed by the parent.

Try self-management to improve your discipline skills. Download this self-management form and use it to help you set goals and monitor your progress.

What if the Tools Aren't Working?

Daily Behavior Report Card

The skills above will work for most children, but some children need more support. For example, if you are a teacher you will notice that most of your class responds wonderfully to these tools, but there will usually also be a handful of children who continue to disrupt your class every day. You may find yourself exhausted, feeling like these children take so much of your energy, and feeling bad for the other children who’s learning is disrupted by them. As a parent you may be dreading another call from your child’s school because they always seem to be in trouble.

These children are not bad, they simply need extra support. They may have a problem such as ADHD, and need closer monitoring and more regular feedback to cope. There is strong evidence that daily report card systems work well for these children, significantly reducing difficult behavior and improving academic results. Daily Behaviour Report Cards are individualized and structured so that the child receives feedback from the teacher on certain goals after every lesson. Examples of goals might be “Did I stay in my seat?” or “Did I wait for my turn before speaking?”. At the end of the day the report is usually sent home to parents. This keeps parents more closely informed and gives them the opportunity to praise and reward their child for their progress. In addition to these benefits, daily report cards provide important data which could inform further interventions (such as an assessment with an educational psychologist) if there is not enough improvement.

If your school does not use daily report cards, you can use this template to custom make one for each child that needs one. There should only be a few children - this is not a class- wide intervention. It’s a good idea for teachers and parents to work together on this, and the child can also be consulted in the process of deciding which goals to monitor. Download here. Remember, daily report card systems are a supportive intervention, not a punishment.

What Not To Do

Click each tile to see why

Those of us who come from a punitive background will very easily find ourselves doing these things. Mistakes and temporary disconnections are normal in relationships, but when they happen it is important to repair the damage and restore the connection as soon as we can. So make it a priority to apologize. Use Peace Discipline on yourself too - don’t beat yourself up when you make a mistake or have a bad day.

It’s coercive It sets a bad example Children will feel less safe with you
Hitting / Physical Punishment
It's assault It’s illegal It hurts children It sets a bad example Many proven negative effects Children will feel less safe with you
It’s aggressive It shows you are losing control It’s ineffective
The Silent Treatment
It’s punitive and mean It can be scary It’s bad for your connection with your child
Guilt Trips
Unnecessary Ineffective The last thing a child needs when they've made a mistake
Unnecessary Can be damaging Our job is to reassure children when they feel shame, not to make them feel ashamed
Its punitive and cruel Children will feel less safe with you
Rhetorical Questions
Send negative messages Ineffective
Makes children feel unsafe Provokes lies and defensiveness
Ineffective Off-putting Annoying Can be hurtful Children switch off
Unnecessary Hurtful
It’s mean It hurts It sets a bad example
Comparing children to others
Ineffective Unnecessary Hurtful
A sales pitch on good behavior, with lots of explaining and reasons
Ineffective Annoying
Leaving things up to harmful natural consequences
It’s our job to keep children safe. They shouldn’t be finding out about seatbelts, sunblock, dental care etc the hard way
Using lies and fear
It makes children feel less safe Its manipulative It sets a bad example
Website By Mikha Davids